ThinkGTJan’11

ThinkGTJan’11

 

GenTrends Newsletter
Think!

The older I get, the more I find myself taking time to think things through before taking action. Some of this is probably an unconscious defense against today’s pressures to do everything efficiently. Since I’m in charge, I have the luxury in time management that many others do not. That said, I often wonder about the cost of mistakes made because of impatience. While those who have been around for a while remember slower times where contemplation was a part of life, those who have come of age with menu-driven digital technology have little experience with the clarity that contemplation provides. Rather than thinking of their own options for action, they have been handed a series of choices for most of life’s decisions. Each one of these menus, of course, comes with an inferred expectation that they will point and click instantaneously.

While this might be fine for the navigation of say-to-day life, it inhibits the critical thinking process for decisions of import. On the job, these might include design of a project, purchase of large machinery, the hiring or firing of personnel or preparing for strategic action with long-term consequences. Is it any wonder then, that I hear from managers who complain that young workers sometimes appear to freeze in place when given a complex assignment the consequences of which will be lasting? To read the remainder of Encouraging Young Workers to Think Before Acting, go to our blog.

 

Case Study

I am the training manager for a medium-sized insurance firm and faced with the challenge of engaging young employees during our quarterly compliance meetings. Our veteran people have accepted that these meetings are a necessary evil and learned to endure them. Our twenty-somethings display little patience for the monotony of these sessions. Having endured countless gatherings like these, I can’t say I blame them. But that doesn’t solve the problem. The senior people in the room are growing increasingly irritated with the texting, web-searching, and game-playing being done when they’re supposed to be paying attention. After all, this is a heavily regulated business and the devil is in the details. Our veteran people are getting tired of catching the mistakes of those who weren’t paying attention during these meetings. Solutions? 

For some, the value of these meetings has probably not been reinforced after initial training. They are therefore left to create their own conclusions based on the scuttlebutt around the office. Information of value, like this, requires periodic reinforcement. While you may not be able to fill the compliance sessions with entertainment, you can certainly create some engaging video clips, cartoons and other media that get your point across to the entertainment-demanding young worker.

Baby Boomers have come to accept that these meetings are a necessary evil, as you say. But that said, their resistance to changing the routine may also be inhibiting you and others from introducing new elements into these gatherings. We have all been in too many meetings where the person conducting the training drones on for fear of missing a provision for which the firm is responsible. The reality is that the traditional reading of compliance documents for the purposes of training has always been miserably ineffective. But the Boomers have found a way to mentally compartmentalize it and the Millennials are rebelling. That’s understandable.

Simply asking someone with more charisma and platform presence to explain these policy changes can make a considerable difference. You might introduce relevant cartoons at the beginning and ends of the sections to liven up the environment. Allow more time for group analysis and ask more provocative questions that stimulate discussion (and a few smart-ass comments that make people laugh). Finally, you might try walking the room occasionally while this training takes place. In spite of the fact that this generation is stimulation-dependent, they still know that using these devices is inappropriate and will put them down if they are being watched.

Then there is how these meetings are perceived by the rank and file. Off-hand comments and amusing remarks do nothing but reinforce the frustration and ineffectiveness of these sessions. While it’s probably impossible to prevent veteran employees from making snarky remarks about these sessions, you might remind them of the impact they’re having on the perceptions and attitudes of young colleagues. They can’t have it both ways – making fun of compliance sessions and expecting their junior co-workers to act respectfully in these meetings.

 

January 2011
Issue 123

 


New Webinars!

Bob will be conducting a series of one hour webinars on topics everyone has been asking about! As with every presentation the Center conducts, these sessions will be packed with practical ideas and information. No sales pitches . . . just content. 

Each registration includes access to the archived recording of the sessions. If you are on-line for the live presentation, you’ll also be able to go back and listen to it again and again to pick up additional ideas and inspiration. Look for an e-mail announcing this new resource for improving your productivity on the job.

GenTistics

Approximately 28% of kids think that looking through postings or comments on social networking sites counts as reading, and 15% of parents agree. 

Scholastic, 2010 

Resources
 
Follow Bob!

Bob Wendover
Bob Wendover, CSP 
Facebook   Linked In   Twitter

 
The Center of Generational Studies The Center for Generational Studies
800-227-5510
www.generationaldiversity.com
info@generationaldiversity.com
Copyright © 2010 The Center for Generational Studies. All rights reserved.

 

Scroll to Top